About

The platform

One system, from source to citation.

Not a wrapper around someone else’s model. TerraSift owns every stage between a source entering the corpus and a citation reaching your page.

01 · Corpus

Sources, tiered and versioned

Assessment reports, journals, agency feeds and your own documents, each placed in a tier before retrieval and pinned to a corpus version you can cite.

02 · Retrieval

Search that reads, not matches

Dense semantic retrieval across the whole corpus, then cross-encoder reranking, so the passages that address the claim beat the ones that merely share its words.

03 · Weighting

The tier model, applied the same way every time

Weight comes from where evidence sits, not how often it repeats. Dissent is surfaced and described rather than averaged away.

04 · Trace

An answer that shows its working

Passages, scores, page references, rejected candidates and model configuration are kept together, so any check can be reopened months later.

05 · Interfaces

A desk to work in, an API to build on

A verification workspace for people who check claims all day, a REST API for your CMS or research pipeline, and exports your compliance team can file.

06 · Deployment

Wherever your evidence has to live

Your hardware, your private cloud, or our EU-hosted instance. The same system in each case — nothing is held back for the cloud edition.

The method

How a claim is settled.

Five stages, in order. The same five whether the claim arrives from a newsroom at 4pm or from an assurance review with a three-week window.

01

Parse the claim

Separate the falsifiable assertion from the framing around it, and state plainly what would have to be true for it to hold.

02

Retrieve wide

Semantic search across the vetted corpus and live agency data — not a web search, and not a lookup of what other people concluded.

03

Rerank

A cross-encoder pushes the passages that genuinely address the claim above the ones that merely share its vocabulary.

04

Weigh, don’t count

Evidence is scored by tier. Ten aligned blog posts do not outweigh one assessment chapter, and volume never stands in for weight.

05

Answer with the trace

A verdict, its uncertainty, and every sentence tied to a page in a named source. Where the literature disagrees, the disagreement is described rather than resolved.

—

Then: the audit file

Query, corpus version, model configuration and retrieved passages are kept, so the check can be reproduced months later.

The evidence base

Weighed, not counted.

Every source in the corpus is placed in one of four tiers before it is ever retrieved. The tier travels with the passage, so you can always see what a verdict is resting on — and how far it is from bedrock.

Tier 4 exists to give context and locate the claim in public debate. It is never load-bearing on its own.

Tier 1Assessment consensus
IPCC AR6 · IPBES Global Assessment · IUCN Red List · national academies
bedrock
Tier 2Peer-reviewed literature
Journal articles, weighted by venue and replication; preprints flagged as such
high
Tier 3Institutional data & monitoring
Copernicus · NOAA · NASA · EEA · Global Forest Watch · national inventories
high, for observation
Tier 4Specialist reporting
Carbon Brief · Mongabay · sector analysts — used for context and framing
context only